A new one has been added to the polemics between the spouses. When the wife of the official who was appointed to Konya did not want to move, he filed for divorce. A precedent decision came from the Supreme Court that overturned the local decision.
The problems experienced among families who are locked in their homes due to Covid-19 continue. While chaos continues among people who want to return to natural life, this time the issue came up with the issue of appointment.
FILED A CASE BECAUSE HE DID NOT WANT TO MOVE WITH HIM
Religious officer Ahmet K, who in Konya Meram district, filed a divorce lawsuit against his wife, who did not move with him .
Ahmet K.’s wife, Hamide K, stated that she did not want to go to the village and settled in their house in Meram District of Konya. After his wife did not go to the village, Ahmet K refused to come to the house in Konya, using his wife’s family as an excuse. Ahmet K filed for divorce because the foundation of the marriage union was shaken. The local court accepted the case of the man, accepting that the parties were equally at fault. It was decided to divorce them.
Thereupon, her husband Hamide K appealed against the decision of the first instance court in terms of appeal. Konya Regional Court of Justice 2nd Civil Chamber rejected all appeals of Hamide K.
The case that came to the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals was concluded. According to the decision, which entered into the jurisprudence, it was stated that the man’s case was accepted on the grounds that the defendant woman was equally guilty in the events that led to the divorce, but the reasoning that “the defendant woman did not want to live in the village, so that the woman did not fulfill her union duties” was not a faulty behavior.
MAN FOUND COMPLETELY DEFECTIVE
It was stated that the man was completely at fault on the grounds that Ahmet K. did not take care of her house, forced the woman to live in the village, and sold their house in Konya without the woman’s knowledge.
The Supreme Court ruled that the local court and the appellate court should dismiss the man’s case. The 2nd Civil Chamber, which annulled the decision of the court of appeal, also overturned the decision of the local court.
