Judgment in the case of Yusuf Aktaş and Bircan Bali, nicknamed “Reynmen”

Two years ago, Yusuf Aktaş, known as Reynmen, shared a post on his social media account after comments were made about him in a television …

Two years ago, Yusuf Aktaş, known as Reynmen, shared a post on his social media account after comments were made about him in a television program presented by Ece Erken and Bircan Bali. Aktaş said, “Your scribbles are endless. Other than talking about people’s private, what else do you have? Share this with me, I’m curious about it. I hope you will return these stories tomorrow in the program. lives then you Bircan Bali filed a complaint with the prosecutor’s office on the post “I will do whatever I can, in legal terms.” At the hearing held at the Istanbul 48th Criminal Court of First Instance, the lawyers of the defendant Yusuf Aktaş and the complainant Bircan Bali were present. made a statement on the merits at the hearing, said, “Due to the same post, the complainant is Ece Erken in the file with the verdict of conviction, it was decided to defer the announcement of the verdict. A decision of non-prosecution was also given the complaint of the accused regarding, and this decision has also become final. We demand the punishment of the accused,” he said.

“Words spoken in response to the statements of the complainants”

Defendant Yusuf Aktaş’s lawyer said, “Neither threats nor insults have occurred. The client has stated that he will exercise his legal rights. For this reason, the crime of ‘threat’ did not occur. The other words he said are the words spoken in response to the statements of the complainants. I demand that my client be acquitted,’ ‘ he said.

Reynmen was acquitted

Announcing its decision, the court ruled that the defendant Yusuf Aktaş acted as a reaction to the negative criticisms of the complainant on the television show, that there was no reason to be sentenced. The court also decided to acquit him because it was not clear that the accused had stated that he would do whatever he could in legal terms in the whole of the post in question and that he had said it for the purpose of ‘threat’.