Pinch is considered grounds for divorce

The divorce case, which was rejected due to ‘lack of evidence’ in the Sandıklı district of Afyonkarahisar, was moved to the Court of Appeal …

The divorce case, which was rejected due to ‘lack of evidence’ in the Sandıklı district of Afyonkarahisar, was moved to the Court of Appeal. The act, known as ‘pinching’, applied to the spouse, was deemed grounds for divorce by the higher court.

jaYAMother of 1 child, whose name has not been disclosed in Sandıklı district offyonkarahisar, filed a divorce case, stating that her husband had used physical and emotional violence and locked her in the room since 2016. A public case was also filed against the husband at the Sandıklı Criminal Court of First Instance with the allegation of “violence against the spouse”. The husband, who was on trial for ‘intentional injury to his wife’ was acquitted of ‘lack of evidence’.

REJECTION FROM LOCAL COURT

The divorce case at the Sandıklı Civil Court of First Instance was also rejected due to ‘lack of evidence’. Mehmet Sait Gürdağ, the lawyer of the woman who was alleged to have been subjected to violence, took the decision to the Court of Appeal. The 2nd Civil Chamber of the Konya Regional Court of Justice overturned the decision of the local court to reject the divorce. The appeal court ruled that the continuous violence of the subject man against the woman was fixed, and decided to accept the divorce because the marital union was shaken to its foundations.

DARP WITH STRIKING ARM AND LEGS

In the summary of the decision of the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Konya Regional Court of Justice, the divorce was accepted on the grounds that the man beat the woman by squeezing her feet, arms and legs intermittently and the action was continuous. given place. The 2nd Law Office ruled that the custody of the joint child from the marriage should be given to the mother.

Attorney Mehmet Sait Gürdağ said, “We filed a divorce case because my client was repeatedly exposed to twisting his arms and legs by his wife and ‘pinching’ in public. The local court found the available evidence insufficient and rejected our case. The Court of Appeals. “Pinching and locking the room was considered violence and overturned the decision, and ruled that the parties should divorce. The seemingly simple act of pinching and locking the spouse in the room was considered a reason for divorce,” he said.

Source: DHA