Etiket: precedent

Surprising decision from the Supreme Court! “Spouses cannot force each other to live in village life!”

A new one has been added to the polemics between the spouses. When the wife of the official who was appointed to Konya did not want to move, he …

A new one has been added to the polemics between the spouses. When the wife of the official who was appointed to Konya did not want to move, he filed for divorce. A precedent decision came from the Supreme Court that overturned the local decision.

The problems experienced among families who are locked in their homes due to Covid-19 continue. While chaos continues among people who want to return to natural life, this time the issue came up with the issue of appointment.

FILED A CASE BECAUSE HE DID NOT WANT TO MOVE WITH HIM

Religious officer Ahmet K, who in Konya Meram district, filed a divorce lawsuit against his wife, who did not move with him .

Ahmet K.’s wife, Hamide K, stated that she did not want to go to the village and settled in their house in Meram District of Konya. After his wife did not go to the village, Ahmet K refused to come to the house in Konya, using his wife’s family as an excuse. Ahmet K filed for divorce because the foundation of the marriage union was shaken. The local court accepted the case of the man, accepting that the parties were equally at fault. It was decided to divorce them.

Thereupon, her husband Hamide K appealed against the decision of the first instance court in terms of appeal. Konya Regional Court of Justice 2nd Civil Chamber rejected all appeals of Hamide K.

The case that came to the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals was concluded. According to the decision, which entered into the jurisprudence, it was stated that the man’s case was accepted on the grounds that the defendant woman was equally guilty in the events that led to the divorce, but the reasoning that “the defendant woman did not want to live in the village, so that the woman did not fulfill her union duties” was not a faulty behavior.

MAN FOUND COMPLETELY DEFECTIVE

It was stated that the man was completely at fault on the grounds that Ahmet K. did not take care of her house, forced the woman to live in the village, and sold their house in Konya without the woman’s knowledge.

The Supreme Court ruled that the local court and the appellate court should dismiss the man’s case. The 2nd Civil Chamber, which annulled the decision of the court of appeal, also overturned the decision of the local court.

Precedent decision from the Supreme Court! Persistent stalking counted as sexual harassment

Hakan Işık, who was on trial for harassing and injuring a woman in Şişli, was imprisoned for 2 years and 9 months. Persistent pursuit of the …

Hakan Işık, who was on trial for harassing and injuring a woman in Şişli, was imprisoned for 2 years and 9 months. Persistent pursuit of the accused was considered sexual harassment.

A precedent has been signed in the recent increase in sexual harassment cases. On November 14, 2021 in Şişli, Hakan Işık went to Meryem B., who was waiting for a taxi with his friend, and talked. Later, Hakan Işık started to follow the taxi that was taken by the friends who did not respond to him. Işık, who took advantage of the friends getting out of the taxi, forcibly grabbed Meryem B.’s arm. In the brawl, Meryem B. was injured by the blow she received. The trial of Işık, who was prosecuted on the basis of the complaint, continued.

persistent pursuit counted as sexual harassment

In the hearing at the Istanbul 8th Criminal Court of First Instance, the accused Light was acquitted of the “sexual assault ” misdemeanor because there was not sufficient and convincing evidence. It was decided. The court deferred the announcement of the decision by sentencing the accused to 2 years, 9 months and 10 days in prison for the misdemeanor of “deliberate injury” and “sexual harassment”

. It was stated that both sexual harassment and the fact that the injury was committed against the complainant who was intoxicated at night was considered as a reason for temptation (aggravating the punishment).